PDA

View Full Version : No facelift for Sens..


Madferret
7-25-05, 2:55 PM
No facelift for Sens: MucklerTeam doesn't plan buyouts, major lineup changes
By CHRIS YZERMAN, CP

The theory that the new collective bargaining agreement will force NHL teams to undergo facelifts won?t apply to the Ottawa Senators this year, according to general manager John Muckler.

When the Senators open the season Oct. 5 against Toronto at the Air Canada Centre, their fans can expect to see a team pretty similar to the one that last skated off that same ice surface in April 2004 after being beaten out of the playoffs by the Leafs.

Unlike teams such as the Philadelphia Flyers, which was the first club to purge itself of contracts over the weekend, Muckler confirmed Monday at the Senators? official 2005-06 season launch that Ottawa won?t follow suit, despite having just 10 players under contract for a total of $23.6 million US for next season.

That means they?ll retain the services of forward Bryan Smolinski (scheduled to earn $2.24 million in 2005-06) and defenceman Greg de Vries ($2.28 million) ? both rumoured to be headed out of Ottawa.

Under terms of the new CBA, teams are right now allowed the chance to buy out existing contracts at two-thirds of their value.

?We?re not going to do that,? Muckler said. ?We like our players. Our first priority is to keep them. ?I?m happy we?re in that position rather than in the position of a buyer.?

Muckler said he and assistant general manager Peter Chiarelli will sit down this week and start work aimed at getting several out-of-contract players ? Marian Hossa, Martin Havlat and Jason Spezza, among them ? back in uniform under the new $39-million salary cap.

While those three would likely still get healthy deals even with the cap in place, Muckler?s insistence that the team won?t buy out any players means there will be less money to go around for some of the team?s long-serving role players like Todd White and Chris Neil.

?I hope I?m in Ottawa, it?s a great city and a great organization,? Neil, a restricted free agent who would have made $700,000 last year, said after watching the team?s season-ticket and marketing kickoff at the Corel Centre. ?(But) no one knows if they?re here or not.?

Under the slogan ?This is a whole new game,? the Senators announced that they?re reducing the prices of some of their most expensive seats by as much as 33 per cent.

Season-ticket holders, who already were told that prices would be frozen for two-years in addition to receiving a five-per-cent rebate will also receive free player-signed replica jerseys.

Ottawa, which will open at home on Oct. 8 against a yet-to-be-announced opponent, will also discount other seats at the Corel Centre, including three early season Welcome Back Nights where all tickets will be half-price.

What would also likely help bring back fans is the fact that Senators coach Bryan Murray, who has yet to get behind the bench of the team he took over last off-season, wants the same kind of up-tempo team that Ottawa was capable of icing before the lockout.

He said he may try to take advantage of the new rule changes ? the removal of the red line and the league?s promise to eliminate obstruction, for example ? by putting together a line featuring Spezza, who was the American Hockey League?s top scorer during the lockout, at centre with swift-skating Havlat on the left side and high-scoring captain Daniel Alfredsson on the right.

Senators defenceman Chris Phillips, who will join teammates Wade Redden at Canada?s Olympic training camp next month, was also on hand to kick things off. He?s in favour of Ottawa retaining its previous look and excited about seeing the Senators perform under the new rules, which he thinks could appease disgruntled home fans.

?I hope that (the fans) see there had to be changes in the system and, unfortunately, it took some time to get those changes in place,? Phillips said. ?But they?ve done everything for the better of the game.

?Maybe that year off made (fans?) anticipation grow stronger for everybody and excited to get back at it.?

Newfie John
7-25-05, 6:55 PM
Which means they have to sign at least 13 more players with about 15 million. Just barely over a million per player. It's obvious they won't be going at the UFA market very hard considering the RFA's that have to be signed, and will be commanding fairly sized salaries. For example, Hossa, Havlat and Spezza.

Should be interesting.

TimmyTabasco
7-25-05, 7:19 PM
That sucks

I was hoping they would cut deVries lose, thus giving the Canucks a chance to bring him back west

Lets face it, he hasn't been the same solid dman in the east, as he was, for the west :nod:

Darsehole Tucker
7-25-05, 8:58 PM
Which means they have to sign at least 13 more players with about 15 million. Just barely over a million per player. It's obvious they won't be going at the UFA market very hard considering the RFA's that have to be signed, and will be commanding fairly sized salaries. For example, Hossa, Havlat and Spezza.

Should be interesting.

We made it work before at just over the cap, so I'm reasonably confident that they'll get it done again. One interesting thing though that they were talking about on The Team today, was that although buy-outs are allowed, they aren't allowed to re-negotiate existing salaries. So even if Todd White were willing to take a paycut to stay here, neither side would be allowed to do that. You're absolutely right though, it'll definitely be interesting to see how they balance everything.

Madferret
7-25-05, 9:31 PM
...by putting together a line featuring Spezza, who was the American Hockey League?s top scorer during the lockout, at centre with swift-skating Havlat on the left side and high-scoring captain Daniel Alfredsson on the right.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/entertainment/0302/gallery.simpsons.characters/gallery.mr.burns.jpg

E - X - C - E - L - L - E - N - T !!

Man.Utd
7-25-05, 9:53 PM
Not totally unexpected. Why pay to cut a guy loose when you can trade him? These guys aren't pending FA's - they have contracts - just people with a fairly high salary. Don't be surprised to see a guy like Smolinski be dealt to a team for a low-end pick. There's likely be a good handful of team with lots of cap-room who'd take him in a trade if they give up next to nothing. His contract isn't that bad to start with, he gets more affordable as time goes by, is still pretty productive, and good to have in the room with younger guys. In the new NHL, expect to see some very one-sided trades (on paper) as teams attemp to off-load some $$$ to other teams who can and are willing to take some on. This won't happen with guys like LeClaire, but guys like Smoke who's contracts aren't totally unreasonable......

I think we have to keep de Vries. He seemed pretty good as a Ranger from the little I saw of him on Boradway which is impressive - many careers have gone down the drain there. NYR fans loved him and thought they got screwed in the deal, and de Vries seems to be the perfect partner for Redden in theory (good, experienced, phsyical stay-at-home guy). The perfect #4 if he can re-gain his form. Given the circumstances last year (new system, new coach, wrong side of ice and little time to adjust, new defensive partner) I think it's a bit too early to pass judgement.

Man.Utd
7-25-05, 10:04 PM
One interesting thing though that they were talking about on The Team today, was that although buy-outs are allowed, they aren't allowed to re-negotiate existing salaries. So even if Todd White were willing to take a paycut to stay here, neither side would be allowed to do that. You're absolutely right though, it'll definitely be interesting to see how they balance everything.

In White case we'll likely need to not qualify him and hope he'll sign here as a UFA for a low salary. He has stated on numerous occasions that he likes playing in Ottawa, loves being in his home town, has developed a bond with many players, and would like to continue playing here. This is also the only NHL city White has ever had succes in. And he has a shot at the Cup here. So you hever know. If not, he's replaceable. I can't really see him going anywhere else; he's not a big-enough name to pick and choose teams and there won't be many clubs offering him a ton of money. Florida is a possibility with the Martin connection, but other than that.......

Madferret
7-25-05, 10:46 PM
-- Ritch Winter, the agent for unrestricted free-agent winger Peter Bondra, told the Sun this week in Toronto that his client intends to play next season. Bondra, acquired at the trade deadline in 2004 by Muckler, has expressed an interest in returning to Ottawa. "He wants to play, but it's got to be the right situation and I'm not sure what's going to happen in Ottawa. I would think there is going to be some interest there, but I can't say because we haven't had any formal discussions about it," said Winter.

Source (http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Ottawa/2005/07/23/1144714-sun.html)

Newfie John
7-25-05, 11:17 PM
Pretty much the Sens will have the same team as last year, unless Muckler pulls a miracle. I'm trying to figure out what he has planned to improve his team but I just can't. Which stands the reason why he's an NHL GM and I'm not.

Madferret
7-25-05, 11:26 PM
Pretty much the Sens will have the same team as last year, unless Muckler pulls a miracle. I'm trying to figure out what he has planned to improve his team but I just can't. Which stands the reason why he's an NHL GM and I'm not.

As Andy mentioned, plenty of low $$$ contract trade bait.
Always a Plan B in Ottawa...

Newfie John
7-25-05, 11:29 PM
As Andy mentioned, plenty of low $$$ contract trade bait.
Always a Plan B in Ottawa...

Very true. It's a risk though if you're not going to buy these guys out. It could work out amazingly, or worst case scenario, have the same team as last year, which still isn't bad. Considering they all have one more year of experience and growth.

Darsehole Tucker
7-26-05, 6:15 PM
Source (http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Ottawa/2005/07/23/1144714-sun.html)

Are you just trying to tickle my Bondra-bone? ;) You know that I want them to bring this guy back (at a reasonable salary)

butterfly_style
7-27-05, 10:04 AM
Are you just trying to tickle my Bondra-bone? ;) You know that I want them to bring this guy back (at a reasonable salary)
I would love to see Bondra play a full season in Ottawa.

Man.Utd
8-02-05, 5:52 PM
Not worthy of a new thread but i thought I'd throw it out here. When we get to next off-season we got some big question marks on defense. But thus far none of the UFA's have gone for more than 4 - 4.5M per season and that includes guys like Foote. Obviously Z is one of a kind, but maybe Redden (currently making 3.725M) won't be in for much of a pay raise. Ottawa will more cap room next with Hasek likely gone and de Vries and Smoke making less money. Maybe retaining all of our guys, at least on the blueline, won't be too much of an issue if the market place for blueliners remains a constant and our players want to continue to play in the Nation's capital.

It'll be interesting to see what Gonchar gets. They're made the same $$$ last year I believe and I can't see Redden getting a bigger raise than Sergei.

Man.Utd
8-03-05, 11:22 AM
There we have it. So Gonchar gets 5M, while Foote and Aucoin get 4M - 4.5M.

Redden shouldn't be able to command more than 4.5 when he's a UFA. So really we're looking at (roughly) an 800k raise for Redden.

Chara may get more than that but based on our team's payroll structure can't command much more than Wade at this point. And with Pronger (former Norris and Hart winner) getting 6.5/per Chara will likely see Ottawa offer a multi-year deal worth 5M/year and say take it or leave it. Thanks to some fair value signings happening on the blueline this off-season, Ottawa's job gets alot easier next season. We may not (probably not) keep everyone, but for another season we may see status-quo, minus player X, as our worst case scenario.

bluemeanie
8-03-05, 11:32 AM
We may not (probably not) keep everyone, but for another season we may see status-quo, minus player X, as our worst case scenario.

Ewww... I hope Player X becomes available. The Leafs could use him.
I'm surprised Gonchar went that high.

Man.Utd
8-03-05, 12:28 PM
I'm surprised Gonchar went that high.

Same. You can't tell me he's worth almost as much as pronger Pronger. But overall, the going rate of premium defenseman is going to make our UFA situation much easier next season.