PDA

View Full Version : Rangers committed to youth


Mel
7-25-05, 2:25 PM
NHL Notebook: Rangers committed to youth movement
Monday, July 25, 2005

From wire dispatches

As honest as the lockout was long, Don Maloney's words rang loud and true -- at least if you are a Rangers fan.

"This lockout, from a purely hockey point of view, was the best thing that could have happened to us," the Rangers assistant general manager has said.

From the standpoint of wiping out what was sure to be another disastrous Rangers season, who could argue: The 310-day lockout and the salary-cap-based collective bargaining agreement have given the Rangers an unprecedented do-over, a chance to erase many of the effects of the club's mismanagement in recent years and put the Rangers on equal footing with the NHL's other 29 teams.

Of course, a do-over is worthless unless the team changes direction. And to hear Maloney tell it, the Rangers not only have charted a new course, they're committed to staying on it. Even if there are more big-name free agents available this summer (beginning Aug. 1) than ever before, the only major fishing the Rangers will be doing is the kind owner Jim Dolan and general manager Glen Sather did in British Columbia over the weekend.

"The exciting thing for us is we're in a new boat now," Maloney said. "We're going young. We're staying young. We're not going to load up on a lot of the older free agents who might be available. We're committed to this and that's exciting to me.

"We're looking forward to see that next star emerge. Who's going to be that next [Alexei] Kovalev, that next [Mark] Messier or great player of the past? And that's what we need here in New York. Instead of buying that star, we're going to grow that star."

First, though, they're going to have to unload a couple of big names.

Though there still is some agonizing within the organization over the decision, the Rangers plan to buy out the contracts of forward Bobby Holik and defenseman Darius Kasparaitis.

The two bruising veterans signed with the Rangers one day apart in July 2002. Holik got a five-year, $45-million contract that has two years left at $8.85 million per year. Kasparaitis got a six-year, $25.5-million deal that has three years left at a total of $12.8 million.

Even with the 24 percent rollback on existing contracts, that's too much money for too long a period to pay a checking center and second-tier defenseman, especially since the one-time amnesty period that began Saturday allows teams to buy out players at two-thirds their rolled-back contract values without taking a cap hit.

So before the 5 p.m. deadline Friday, Dolan will write checks for a total of $15.453 million -- $8.968 million to Holik, $6.485 million to Kasparaitis -- and make them unrestricted free agents who can sign with anybody but the Rangers.

The only other players of note the Rangers have under contract will comprise two-thirds of their top line come opening night Oct. 5 in Philadelphia -- Jaromir Jagr and Michael Nylander.

Factoring in the rollback and the approximately $4 million that Washington agreed to kick in just to be rid of him, the Rangers only will have to pay Jagr $4.8 million this season. Nylander is due $2.204 million.

The Rangers have all but decided to make the $2.356 million qualifying offer required to keep defenseman Tom Poti. And they plan to re-sign veteran goaltender Kevin Weekes, who never got to play with them after inking a one-year, $1.375 million contract last summer.

As for the rest of the roster, Maloney insists more players will have minor-league and college pedigrees than lengthy NHL resumes.

"We are committed to building this team," he said. "Is that to say that we wouldn't sign somebody who would fit into what we're trying to accomplish the next three, four years down the road? Absolutely not."

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05206/543233.stm

It will be refreshing to cheer for a youthful and hungry team for once. :thumb:

I can't wait to see which young guys emerge as team leaders and watch this team gel over the coming years.

(I don't think Poti is worth 2.3 million)

Madferret
7-25-05, 3:11 PM
Agreed. A healthy mix of young & old high calibre players in NYR should make for entertaining hockey! No more of this 'Stars on Ice' nonsense...

KB in Kelowna
7-25-05, 3:51 PM
I haven't follwed the AHL much, but how were the Hartford Wolfpack. Do the Rangers have a core of good minor league prospects to build around?

Mel
7-25-05, 4:10 PM
Here's a look at how their prospects faired this past season: http://www.newyorkrangers.com/team/prospects.asp


Here's the wolf pack roster
http://www.hartfordwolfpack.com/roster.php

I don't follow the CHL (it's not even covered down here) but a few guys I like the look of based on numbers are:

Nigel Dawes
Jonathan Paiement
Jakub Petruzalek
Brandon Dubinsky

Again I don't know much about any of them.

Euopean names that people buzz about are

Fedor Tyutin
Maxim Kondratiev
Jarkko Immonen
Henrik Lundqvist (goal)

College:

Al Montoya (goal)
Hugh Jessiman

They made a big deal of this kid Hugh Jessiman (1st roung pick '03). But I see he only played 4 games this past year... I have to think he got injured. They have high hopes for him, but he's actually from my neck of the woods. I know a few guys who played with him and say he's not all that... but I say it's jealousy. 12th overall pick - he must be good for something.

I think the single guy I'm most excited about is Lundqvist. The Rangers haven't had quality goal tending since pre-concussion Mike Richter.

KB in Kelowna
7-25-05, 5:42 PM
Nigel Dawes was a player I liked to watch in the WHL, he played for the Kootenay Ice. He is a keeper IMO. He may be small but is a very creative palyer.

Newfie John
7-25-05, 7:21 PM
The Rangers do have some decent up and comers. They already have on their roster Jamie Lundmark. He's had to go through some injuries but he is a youngster on that team and should be a pretty good player. Same for Josef Balej who they recieved from Montreal. Don't forget Henrik Lundqvist, he was the 3rd string goaltender for Sweden at the WHC, behind Telly and Salo. They also have former leaf prospect Jarkko Immonen, he's shown flashes but his size is a huge question mark. I mean this guy is really small. Nigel Dawes we all know from team Canada at the WJC. His size is also a big question, no doubt about it though, this kid is a sniper. His defensive game needs work and he has some growing to do. The Rangers also have Thomas Pock, who I think is very underrated as an NHL prospect. I think he'll be in the NHL when his time comes. Also don't forget Maxim Kondratiev. He's another former leaf prospect. He should be a top 4 defencemen, most likely at the 3 or 4 as a PP specialist. His committment has been a question mark though. Another one that I almost forgot about is Al Montoya, but he's seemed to fall off of the face of the earth.

The Rangers have a pretty good future IMO. The thing with the Rangers is that they are top heavy IMO in terms of prospects. They have couple of good kids at the top, but the depth is where they really fall short.

Mel
7-25-05, 8:23 PM
Thanks for the run-down John. As I mentioned the only hockey coverage you get in the states is NHL. It's extremely rare that you get AHL coverage... let alone WHL, OHL, And QMJHL. I really don't know much about any of these guys. I know Lundqvist because he got called up from Hartford a few times IIRC. Also at last year's March 04 fire sale, they also landed a lot of picks, a few early rounders I believe... but it's so hard to follow hockey below the NHL level being in New York. They might be able to turn a few of those prospects/picks into some better prospects/picks. It's hard to say. I'm so used to them "buying" guys who's production always decreases once they arrive in NY. Luc Robitaille was the poster boy for NYR under achievement.

I don't know if it's the pressure of the NY media or the east coast style of play... all I know is it hasn't worked in a decade. I'm ready for change.

I was slightly pumped about Karel Rachunek... but then some ottowa fans deflated my balloon about him. Now I don't even know if the Rags still own him. I thought he might be an RFA... but I don't see his name on the roster.

Lundmark had big hopes... he got a little distracted by all that NY has to offer I heard ;) but he slowly improved, only to get kneed by f---ing Michael Peca. Hopefully he's still got a bright future.

Nylander and Jagr play nice together. That should be good...

People were buzzing about the russian D pair of Tyutin and Kondratiev. I don't have any idea how they'll do in the NHL... but I hope the hype is worthy, even if it takes a few years.

Leafs_Fa_Life
7-26-05, 2:09 AM
They made a big deal of this kid Hugh Jessiman (1st roung pick '03). But I see he only played 4 games this past year... I have to think he got injured. They have high hopes for him, but he's actually from my neck of the woods. I know a few guys who played with him and say he's not all that... but I say it's jealousy. 12th overall pick - he must be good for something.

He looks like he has first line potential. I found this on HockeysFuture about him.

Talent Analysis

Hugh Jessiman?s calling card has and will be his size. Tipping the scales at 6?5" and 218 Jessiman has world class size. His skating is good especially for a man of his size. Jessiman has decent hands and has shown good scoring ability at the NCAA level. He's a good competitor and works hard consistently, but needs to polish defensive zone coverage and on ice decisions.

Future

Jessiman possesses almost every feature that a future NHL power forward should have. He has size, strength, skill and the skating ability to be a top line forward. The only issue with Jessiman is to refine all of the skills into one very tight package. Once he develops his defensive zone coverage and if he increases the physical side of his game there is nothing preventing Jessiman from being a top forward in the NHL.

Mel
7-26-05, 8:42 AM
He looks like he has first line potential. I found this on HockeysFuture about him.

I like the sound of that :thumb: He's a New York native as well. If he reaches his potential he might just turn out to emerge as a leader for this team.

(although I still don't know why he has no stats for this past season). Now that Rangers coverages is back I'm sure we'll get caught up on what we missed all year.

Madferret
7-27-05, 5:54 PM
The New York Rangers were also busy locking down their draft picks, signing goalie Alvaro Montoya to a multi-year deal, believed to be the maximum allowed under the new CBA.

Montoya played with the University of Michigan last season posting a 2.52 GAA and a 30-7 record.
Source (http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20050727_122425_5080)

Mel
8-02-05, 6:56 PM
The rangers signed Jessiman to a pro contract the other day.

http://www.newyorkrangers.com/pressbox/pressreleases.asp?id=1666

I was right he did get hurt this past season and missed most of it.

He's actually up to 6-6, 226 pounds now... I'll be following his development closely in camp, and assume he'll be assigned to Hartford. But hey... the Rangers have 2 forwards and do not appear to be actively pursuing any big names (or small names for that matter). Maybe Jessiman has a chance to make the team this year.

KB in Kelowna
10-11-05, 2:28 PM
Peter Worrel is with Hartford now. Wonder if he will see any action with Rangers this year? He has size, but was an awkward skater is there a role for his type of game in the"new NHL"?

TimmyTabasco
10-17-05, 4:59 PM
How good is Lundqvist?

I noticed his numbers overseas are very good

Plus, he is putting up above average numbers this season

Mel
10-17-05, 6:11 PM
How good is Lundqvist?

I noticed his numbers overseas are very good

Plus, he is putting up above average numbers this season

Excellent. He was the best goalie in the Swedish Elite league last year. I'm excited about this kid. He might just be the Rangers long-term answer between the pipes, the one they've been unable to find since Mike Richter was forced to retire on short notice some years ago.

He has given up just one goal in each of his last 2 starts. Obviously that's nice, but he hasn't faced an high powered offense yet to be fair.

As for the Rangers, Lundqvist is ranked higher than Montoya. I'd really like to see the starting job be handed to Lundqvist with Weekes in the back up role. Truth be told if it looks like he is the real deal as he breaks into the league and gets tested by better NHL teams... the Rangers might want to consider dealing Montoya in a package for some "right-now" help. It's nice to have all these picks and prospects, coupled with the "new Ranger strategy" of actually allowing prospects time to develop... But I don't think there's any harm in dealing a Montoya if he's not likely to ever win the starting job on Broadway anyway.

Tonight he squares off against another anemic offense (Florida) but also one of the best net-minders in the business (Luongo).

Of course I can't watch the game thanks to Comcast / Cablevision :curse:

Any way that's my long answer. He's good. It goes without saying he's got a long way to go to prove that he is NHL material let alone an elite NHL G... but I like what I see so far. I haven't been this optimistic about NYR goal tending situation since Richter's prime. Even Danny Blackburn was iffy to me, and hadn't he got injured, he'd likely be the Rags #1 right now... I'm glad he's not (although I am certainly not glad that he was forced to end his career before it got a chance to really begin - sad story for him)

(I also like Weekes, moreso than Dunham, or any of the other recent band-aid solutions, and who knows how Montoya's going to come along in Hartford - right now he's backing up Lundqvist until Weekes is healed... maybe he'll get a start before they send him back down.)