PDA

View Full Version : Moore won't block Bertuzzi's reinstatement


Iced Tea
4-13-05, 3:24 PM
Moore won't stand against Bertuzzi's bid
Reinstatement up to NHL, lawyer says

Gut-wrenching decision for Bettman

DAMIEN COX

Steve Moore won't stand in Todd Bertuzzi's way.

Moore's lawyer, Tim Danson, said yesterday that the NHL contacted the former Colorado Avalanche forward late last week to ask if he would be willing to give testimony at a reinstatement hearing for Bertuzzi, possibly as early as this week.

"One of the facts the NHL wants to take into account is Steve Moore's recovery," Danson said. "In that respect, we are prepared to answer any questions the NHL has of us.

"But Steve Moore will not take a position on whether Todd Bertuzzi should be reinstated. He accepts the fact that decision is the exclusive domain of the NHL and he doesn't want to influence the decision in any way."

Reasonably magnanimous, it's fair to say, for an athlete who had his career ruined by Bertuzzi and then wasn't allowed to give a victim impact statement in court at Bertuzzi's assault trial.

Bertuzzi is anxiously hoping that a reinstatement hearing could be held within a matter of days so that, if cleared by commissioner Gary Bettman, he might be asked to join Team Canada for the world hockey championship in Austria.

Canadian GM Steve Tambellini has left a forward position unfilled on his 23-man roster and the thinking is that it is there for Bertuzzi if he becomes eligible.

Moore has previously said he never wants to again play hockey on the same rink as Bertuzzi, so his reluctance to take a strong stand against Bertuzzi's reinstatement could be interpreted as a softening of his position.

The NHL has maintained from the day Bertuzzi was banned on March 11, 2004, that Moore's health would be considered if and when Bertuzzi asked to have the suspension lifted.

In announcing the ban, the league said Bertuzzi's reinstatement would be considered "in light of all the available facts at that time, including Mr. Moore's physical status and the progression of his recovery."

According to Danson, Moore has progressed little since telling a press conference last December that he was suffering from post-concussion syndrome, headaches and dizziness and could not participate in "any activity even resembling a workout."

Thirteen months after the unprovoked assault at GM Place in Vancouver, Moore still can't exercise, Danson said.

"All I can really say is that Steve's condition has not really changed," said Danson, who is working with a Denver attorney on a civil suit filed by Moore in February against Bertuzzi and the Vancouver Canucks. "Steve has indicated to me his progress has been slower than he would have liked. But he is very positive and optimistic and has every intention of getting better and resuming his NHL career."

So while Moore won't protest Bertuzzi's being allowed back into the NHL family, his health might speak much more loudly. With the NHL inactive and Moore still injured, there might be no clear reason to lift the suspension.

Clearly, this is going to be a gut-wrenching decision for Bettman, who has had a petition for reinstatement from Bertuzzi on his desk for more than six months.

Making it worse, however, is the NHL's curious behaviour in this matter, doubly odd given the strong and immediate manner in which the suspension was handed down three days after the incident. In recent weeks, however, the league hasn't committed to holding a hearing, but also hasn't said it won't and really hasn't made any concrete statement at all on Bertuzzi.

Yes, this lockout business has clouded all NHL business for a while. But by leaving Bertuzzi, Moore and now Team Canada hanging uncertain as to the direction in which this entire process is headed, the NHL has created an unnecessary degree of intrigue to one of the ugliest incidents in league history.

Already, that has caused rumour and speculation. There have been insinuations, for example, that Moore is dragging his feet and making himself unavailable for a hearing to block Bertuzzi's participation in the world championship, suggestions Danson shot down. "I mean, they just asked us last week," he said.

Danson said the NHL didn't indicate to him when such a hearing might take place "other than quickly."

It's time for the NHL to get upfront and transparent here. Call a hearing, let Moore make his representation, let Bertuzzi ask for clemency and then have Bettman make a decision.

Whether he reinstates Bertuzzi or not, he'll get hit with criticism. But simply putting it off and playing back-channel political games won't make this nightmare go away or make a fair resolution any clearer.
I'm not sure how I feel about this. I like Bertuzzi as a player but what he did was vicious. Bettman has a tough job ahead of him but I'm glad that Moore finally gets to say his piece to the NHL. Too bad Moore doesn't get to tell the NHLPA a thing or two as well.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1113342619206&call_pageid=968867503640&col=970081593064&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tacodalogin=yes

TimmyTabasco
4-13-05, 4:22 PM
I think all hockey fans understand what bertuzzi did was moronic, just not very smart.

However, I also think MOST hockey fans feel that he has paid his dues for what he has done.

Its time he should be allowed to play

a4l
4-13-05, 4:27 PM
I am not sure how I feel about this. Part of me thinks Bert has learned his lesson BUT the original punishment was to be off as long as Moore.

KB in Kelowna
4-13-05, 5:09 PM
I am not sure how I feel about this. Part of me thinks Bert has learned his lesson BUT the original punishment was to be off as long as Moore.


I don't remember that part of terms of the suspension. It was indefinite, meaning Bettman was putting off his decision. Well Gary its not like your agenda is full make a determination. It will be too long a suspension for some and not long enough for others.

Bob burns
4-13-05, 5:33 PM
Did I miss something, what happened? Who is this Steve Moore character and when did Bertuzzi run into him?? :razz2:

Anyway, as many of you know I feel Bertuzzi has been overpunished as it is, and if he wants to play in this nationalized tournament he should. It has been over a year since his attack on Moore, and both have sufferred enough, why must Bertuzzi continue to be punished? We don't live in an eye for an eye society, and we should maintain that. Hopefully Moore recovers soon because he never deserved what happened to him.

Amoroq
4-13-05, 5:45 PM
Oh no, not another Bertuzzi thread ;)

Ok my 2 cents. He missed the rest of the regular season and the playoffs as a first part of the punishment and the rumour at the time was that he would probably get some more time off when the 2004/2005 season started. We haven't had a 2004/2005 season, so all he has served is what he got. I for one think that what he got and what he has already served was enough and its over as fas as I am concerned. But there are some out there who think he hasn't suffered enough.

PDO
4-13-05, 8:43 PM
Oh no, not another Bertuzzi thread ;)

Ok my 2 cents. He missed the rest of the regular season and the playoffs as a first part of the punishment and the rumour at the time was that he would probably get some more time off when the 2004/2005 season started. We haven't had a 2004/2005 season, so all he has served is what he got. I for one think that what he got and what he has already served was enough and its over as fas as I am concerned. But there are some out there who think he hasn't suffered enough.

Just to add $0.02 a lot of those people forget he was NOT allowed to play in Europe, nor in the WC, nor in the World Champs.

KB in Kelowna
4-27-05, 11:31 AM
The spin on yesterday I am hearing is that Steve Moore would like the suspension to be extended. But there again the media may be biased.

I am thinking Bertuzzi will get an additional 10 to 20 games tacked on, once there is a start to a new NHL season.

Now if the league starts in Novemeber with replacements what does it mean then? Kidding I just thought I would be a smart alec ;)

Rusty
4-29-05, 10:00 AM
Why is everyone assuming he was a shoe in for a Canadian international team?

I don't want to sound ignorant, but how many times has he played for Canada?

Canucklehead
4-29-05, 1:30 PM
Why is everyone assuming he was a shoe in for a Canadian international team?

I don't want to sound ignorant, but how many times has he played for Canada?
I think he was a shoe in. Tambellini made it known he wanted Bertuzzi on the team and on pure skill Bertuzzi is better then at least half the guys on the roster.

Rusty
4-30-05, 12:14 AM
I just do not see why some people gush all over this guy, he has got a history of doing pure stupid things, and spare me the "He was sticking up for his team mates" talk. He has a discipline problem.

Canucklehead
4-30-05, 1:59 PM
I just do not see why some people gush all over this guy, he has got a history of doing pure stupid things, and spare me the "He was sticking up for his team mates" talk. He has a discipline problem.
But when he is on, he is unstoppable. Like when he came back from that 10 day suspension and led the league is scoring. People "gush" over him because at times he has been the best player in the league. He does have a serious discipline problem though. I agree with you there. I've watched Cancuck games and have been furious watching him take stupid penalties.

Amoroq
4-30-05, 8:53 PM
An intersting article from Stephen Brunt Globe and Mail

LINK (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050429.wxbrunt29/BNStory/Sports/)
However you need a paid freeking subscription!!

When Steve Moore spoke this week at a hearing to determine the final fate of his attacker, Todd Bertuzzi wanted to be in the room.

He was not, and his agent declines to fill in all of the blanks. But it's safe to assume that Bertuzzi was left outside because Moore didn't want to see him, because Moore wants no part of him, because Moore isn't ready to let him off the hook in any way.

You don't see that kind of unvarnished, true-life emotion often these days, at least on the public stage. The norm now is phony bonhomie, homilies about how even the worst of us are really fine folks down deep, backslapping and warm words and letting bygones be bygones. In front of the cameras, all is forgiven in an orgy of hugs and smiles, like the aftermath of a Hollywood divorce.

The world isn't really like that, though, and human beings aren't really like that. They don't always forgive; they don't always forget.


That uncomfortable truth is one very significant part of the problem facing National Hockey League commissioner Gary Bettman right now, as he determines how much longer Bertuzzi should be banned from professional hockey.

Obviously, he has to weigh Bertuzzi's suspension against precedent, though there really aren't any, especially when you add the complicating factor of the lockout into the mix. Bertuzzi has missed more than a year, but most of that was a year without NHL hockey. He lost the chance to play in Europe, but how do you fairly measure the punitive value of that?

The last time the NHL really lowered the boom, when Marty McSorley whacked Donald Brashear over the head with his stick (and, as in this case, the courts intervened) Bettman faced a comparatively simple task.

McSorley was at the end of his career, and in any case wasn't a star attraction. In cold, hard terms, he was expendable.

And his victim was a different type as well. Brashear might have thought, "There but for the grace of God go I," as he watched McSorley face the music. It could have been him on the other end of that stick, just as it has been him beating the heck out of opponents in his role as a hockey enforcer. After the incident, he went back to that job soon enough.

McSorley's time off merely hastened his retirement by a few months, putting him out of sight and out of mind. And there was no one bearing witness, there was no victim left haunting the game.

Moore certainly wasn't a goon, and he certainly wasn't at the end of his playing life. The worst thing he did was to land what was, even after review, considered a perfectly legal bodycheck. For that, he was pursued, he was repeatedly challenged to fight (and did), and finally he was sucker punched from behind, had his head rammed into the ice, and suffered what now seems to be permanent neurological damage.

He's not coming back to the NHL, but he's not walking away quietly either, no matter how much some hockey folks would prefer that he fade into the background. He's not coming back to the NHL, but he's not walking away quietly either, no matter how much some hockey folks would prefer that he fade into the background. He's not going to make this any easier for the league, for Bertuzzi, for the Canucks, for anyone. He's not prepared to step up and say, well, that's just part of the game -- because he knows that it is not, or at least that it shouldn't be.

That's because Moore is smart enough to understand that this will be his only opportunity to secure at least a modicum of justice. That window of public interest and legal opportunity closes quickly. Whatever happens with his civil lawsuit (it's likely to be thrown out in Colorado, and then refiled in British Columbia), eventually the NHL will get its wish, and Moore will disappear.

At some point, Bertuzzi will return to the Vancouver Canucks, will again be a highly paid professional athlete, will be hailed as a hero by the home folks, will win games, represent his country in its national game and return to the pedestal. The Moore Incident, as it will become known in sports-writing shorthand, will be appended to his career story, cast as a moment of reckoning, or a turning point, or perhaps, merely as a blip.

At no point will Moore return to being the person he was in the moments before the attack, and that isn't an accident, it isn't a natural byproduct of a rough and rugged sport, it isn't right. For now, while he still has their attention, he needs everyone to understand that.

TimmyTabasco
5-01-05, 7:36 PM
An
Moore certainly wasn't a goon, and he certainly wasn't at the end of his playing life. The worst thing he did was to land what was, even after review, considered a perfectly legal bodycheck.

That's because Moore is smart enough to understand that this will be his only opportunity to secure at least a modicum of justice.



I totally disagree with the writer on this one. Is he related to a tool named Gary Mason by anychance? :confused:

Moore was a goon. Say what you will,but thats my opinion. He went after the league's leading scorer, and took him out cold. Not a goon? Oh yeah, he's a fringe player..grinder?

I bet the writer would be singing a different tune if Mats Sundin was taken out by Moore.

Moore is smart..I must agree. However, not for the reasons the writer says. He is smart to now know how he can get a fast buck, his version of justice.

I am not against Moore, but look at this..he wants to sue Bertuzzi..alright..go ahead. But he also wants to sue Burke, Crow, and the Canucks???

Respect is all lost, and none is due in the first place